{"id":472,"date":"2012-06-20T01:50:15","date_gmt":"2012-06-20T01:50:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/test\/?page_id=472"},"modified":"2012-06-20T01:50:15","modified_gmt":"2012-06-20T01:50:15","slug":"articles-before-1993","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/welcome\/publications-3\/publications\/articles-before-1993\/","title":{"rendered":"Articles Before 1993"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Note: \u201cRefusals of Hazardous Work Assignments:\u00a0 A Proposal for a Uniform Standard,\u201d 81 <em>Columbia Law Review<\/em> 544-580 (1981)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>DOWNLOAD ARTICLE HERE:\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/Rufusals-of-Hazardous-Work-Assign....pdf\">Rufusals of Hazardous Work Assign&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>ABSTRACT: This note considers regulatory incoherence.\u00a0 The focus is on the development of inconsistent approaches to worker rights to refuse hazardous work. The Note first reviews the present state of the law affecting the right to refuse hazardous work under the federal labor laws and the OSHAct regulations.\u00a0 The Note then analyzes the problems that result from this multi-standard, multi-forum scheme.\u00a0 It argues that harmonization of statutory standards is required under the law and that one unified national standard should be adopted&#8211;the standard under the OSHAct regulations.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Note: \u201cRefusals of Hazardous Work Assignments:\u00a0 A Proposal for a Uniform Standard,\u201d 81 Columbia Law Review 544-580 (1981). DOWNLOAD ARTICLE HERE:\u00a0 Rufusals of Hazardous Work Assign&#8230; ABSTRACT: This note considers regulatory incoherence.\u00a0 The focus is on the development of inconsistent approaches to worker rights to refuse hazardous work. The Note first reviews the present state &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/welcome\/publications-3\/publications\/articles-before-1993\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Articles Before 1993&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":23,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-472","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=472"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":475,"href":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/472\/revisions\/475"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/23"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.backerinlaw.com\/Site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}